To start with let me say clearly that I believe and don't contest the fact that an indoor cat lives longer than it's outdoor bretheren.
My only question is, by who's definition? Any self-respecting cat would choose the life of fighting,hunting,playing,and fornicating over a few extra years of merely existing.
We've always been told that variety is the spice of life. I disagree somewhat. While variety may indeed enrich our minds it's peril, small or large, that enriches the soul.
Can you remember the feeling of climbing to the peak of the tallest tree? Running across that mean bull's pen? The fear? The acceleration? Not being able to stop? Knowing full well your fate if you failed. Can you remember the feeling when you were successful? Nothing quite matches it.
These are the experiences that are vital to human development.
Risk assessment is a vital life skill. From childhood on, it's mandatory.
Unfortunately, a rising number of young people are being deprived of it by "safety nazi's", a breed apart, who's only goal is to make life safe. Mind numbingly, soul destroying, safe.
In my job as a Project Manager I've given up the illusion that the ability to assess and quantify a risk is a given. If you tell most people a "Hazard Assessment" has been done for the job and have give them a list of said Hazards. If anything outside that list occurs they are at a loss as how to deal with it.
It's not their fault, they were denied entry into the school of Hard Knocks. For their own good of course. From the time they could walk they were adorned with helmuts, harnessess and an assortment of GPS gadgets. All for their protection. Unfortunately to their detriment also.
Don't take me wrong. I think technology is fantastic but it is just a tool. Technology should only enhance, not replace human ability. The skill of critical thought makes everything better.
They banned lawn darts and I still can't believe it. Played them at every family BBQ and injuries were non-existent. More injury came from the "friendly game" of touch football. The darts weren't toys. Used properly they were great fun. Apparently the socially engineered can't grasp this concept.
It's always easier to restrict those who can rather than accept that there are those who can't, and probably never will, measure up. We must ensure that everyone is equal don't you know. Public safety is a wonderful thing it makes us equal.
You can still tell the difference between a city kid, and a farm kid when faced with something new, or potentially dangerous. One thinks through it, assesses and reports. The other wonders who to call to make the decision or goes ahead just to see what happens. The only difference is the capacity for independent thought and judgment.
Within reasonable bounds children must be allowed to fail. That's life. Bumps and bruises and YES even scars aren't the end of the world. Helping children learn to recognize their limits is a gift for life. That includes trusting their gut feelings. They have them for a reason.
CHILDREN DON'T NEED SELF-ESTEEM
THEY NEED SELF-CONTROL
Liberty Lewis
Monday, October 5, 2009
Thursday, October 1, 2009
Liberal VS Conservative? Difference?
Over the years I've slowly come to realize that, politicans are pretty much the same. They're all selling THEIR agenda (Odd, it never seems to be OURS) and why this, or that, is vital, and how THEY can fix it, given enough of OUR money. So they're pretty much the same...... unfortunately, WE have no say. They'll take what they want. Not what they need.
But I digress. The only difference I see between a conservative and a Liberal is, the almost "addiction like need" to not only have the right to live life as they choose, but the right to force others to follow suit.
Personally I've always felt that if enough people believed a cause was just, they would support it with either sweat or money, if not both. There's no need for tax dollars to support it.
Canadians have always been about, commonsense, compassion, reason, tolerance. I trust their abilty, if given the facts, to decide what's good for their family and the country.
Unfortunately a Liberal believes to the core of his being that, through the sheer force of his enlightment alone, only he could know best.
Anyone disgreeing simply hasn't ascended to their moral, and ethical plane of enlightenment. So how could their opinions be relevant ,or let's be honest, even matter?
FOCUS IS THE ESSENCE OF SUCCESS
SELF-CONTROL IS THE ESSENCE OF FOCUS
PISS OFF A LIBERAL
THINK FOR YOURSELF
Liberty Lewis
(Remember ... Just My Opinion.)
But I digress. The only difference I see between a conservative and a Liberal is, the almost "addiction like need" to not only have the right to live life as they choose, but the right to force others to follow suit.
Personally I've always felt that if enough people believed a cause was just, they would support it with either sweat or money, if not both. There's no need for tax dollars to support it.
Canadians have always been about, commonsense, compassion, reason, tolerance. I trust their abilty, if given the facts, to decide what's good for their family and the country.
Unfortunately a Liberal believes to the core of his being that, through the sheer force of his enlightment alone, only he could know best.
Anyone disgreeing simply hasn't ascended to their moral, and ethical plane of enlightenment. So how could their opinions be relevant ,or let's be honest, even matter?
FOCUS IS THE ESSENCE OF SUCCESS
SELF-CONTROL IS THE ESSENCE OF FOCUS
PISS OFF A LIBERAL
THINK FOR YOURSELF
Liberty Lewis
(Remember ... Just My Opinion.)
Sunday, September 20, 2009
United Nations
While I'm sure the UN was a laudable idea and at one time was actually usefull it has become by the nature of those who run it a Useless Notion.
From the horrors of Rwanda their inaction ENCOURAGED, to the insanity of Darfur. This is nothing but a group of major Power Seekers who in their Enlightenment actually believe it's a good idea to have Dictators on a human rights committee. Kind of like having a rapist dictate the defintion of what rape is.
The idea of a International Criminal Court may sound good but I see no justification for letting the member groups decide what's legal or not for our country. If anything Canada,United States, should form their own Western Nations pact to protect us from the evil the UN has become.
Their track record has proven they should be the last one to decide what's a righteous cause or not. If the European Union, and the former Great Britian, want to sell out to China,Russia, and a dozen other dictatorships let them. We have little in common with them. Why should we adopt their laws, and belief systems.
Their vision of the world is nothing but them dictating and us doing. No wonder so many people believe in the conspiracy theory of One World Goverment. These un-elected Kings and Queens actually want their will to override our independence but at the same time coddle and court dictatorships.
All the people that serve in this useless organization are idealogues. They believe anyone who opposes them is wrong or greedy. Think Kyoto. Only the developed nations were subject to economy crushing protocols. The others would be convinced to join at a later date.Riiiiight. Forget the fact the number of scientists who disagree with them. As far a they are concerned ONLY the scientists who are on board are worth listening to. The others are wrong or paid by the greedy polluters.
They believe that Governments should have total control of all small arms but the State would sell and buy at their leisure. History shows that ALL genocides were carried out AFTER
governments ensured a disarmed populace. Of course the UN likes that idea.
While there's nothing wrong with an international body to handle inter-nation disputes in an advisory capacity actually giving them any power is foolhardy. If they have good ideas reasonable nations will go along. However they believe they must have the power to Dictate to all.
Democracy isn't a perfect system but it's leaps and bounds ahead of any other. The Canadian government should realize this although from heir actions they would rather not have to deal with it. The liberals are the worst how many times have they excused their raid on OUR rights by saying "International Treaties have forced us to do this.
I am not like an European,Chinese,Russian, African, Asiatic person. I respect their beliefs and traditions but have NO desires to live under their systems of government.
I neither what to be or more importantly want my Grand-Children to be nothing but worker ants in this colony we call earth. If the Western beliefs were so wrong why do Millions strive to come here? I don't see a mass migration to Russia,China, or Europe from North America. The answers easy. People want to be free. To succeed or fail based on their own abilities and drive. That's why the UN needs us to be more like them. Their beliefs are wrong but they refuse to see it. Prefering instead to applaud their own open-mindness and enlightment.
From the horrors of Rwanda their inaction ENCOURAGED, to the insanity of Darfur. This is nothing but a group of major Power Seekers who in their Enlightenment actually believe it's a good idea to have Dictators on a human rights committee. Kind of like having a rapist dictate the defintion of what rape is.
The idea of a International Criminal Court may sound good but I see no justification for letting the member groups decide what's legal or not for our country. If anything Canada,United States, should form their own Western Nations pact to protect us from the evil the UN has become.
Their track record has proven they should be the last one to decide what's a righteous cause or not. If the European Union, and the former Great Britian, want to sell out to China,Russia, and a dozen other dictatorships let them. We have little in common with them. Why should we adopt their laws, and belief systems.
Their vision of the world is nothing but them dictating and us doing. No wonder so many people believe in the conspiracy theory of One World Goverment. These un-elected Kings and Queens actually want their will to override our independence but at the same time coddle and court dictatorships.
All the people that serve in this useless organization are idealogues. They believe anyone who opposes them is wrong or greedy. Think Kyoto. Only the developed nations were subject to economy crushing protocols. The others would be convinced to join at a later date.Riiiiight. Forget the fact the number of scientists who disagree with them. As far a they are concerned ONLY the scientists who are on board are worth listening to. The others are wrong or paid by the greedy polluters.
They believe that Governments should have total control of all small arms but the State would sell and buy at their leisure. History shows that ALL genocides were carried out AFTER
governments ensured a disarmed populace. Of course the UN likes that idea.
While there's nothing wrong with an international body to handle inter-nation disputes in an advisory capacity actually giving them any power is foolhardy. If they have good ideas reasonable nations will go along. However they believe they must have the power to Dictate to all.
Democracy isn't a perfect system but it's leaps and bounds ahead of any other. The Canadian government should realize this although from heir actions they would rather not have to deal with it. The liberals are the worst how many times have they excused their raid on OUR rights by saying "International Treaties have forced us to do this.
I am not like an European,Chinese,Russian, African, Asiatic person. I respect their beliefs and traditions but have NO desires to live under their systems of government.
I neither what to be or more importantly want my Grand-Children to be nothing but worker ants in this colony we call earth. If the Western beliefs were so wrong why do Millions strive to come here? I don't see a mass migration to Russia,China, or Europe from North America. The answers easy. People want to be free. To succeed or fail based on their own abilities and drive. That's why the UN needs us to be more like them. Their beliefs are wrong but they refuse to see it. Prefering instead to applaud their own open-mindness and enlightment.
Friday, September 11, 2009
Gun Control
If your not a gunowner this means stopping crime. If your a gunowner this means a firm two-handed grip on your chosen firearm to ensure accurate shot placement. Probably why they don't see eye to eye.
Power Seekers like the term because once again it allows them to have the "Appearance" of doing something to battle crime. Forget the fact that they are simply displaying their ignorance on the topic.
Simply put they tell the masses that they have made this gun or that gun illegal in order to keep everyone safe or that have implemented additional paperwork to discourage Gun ownership.
When you think about it all they are saying is that they don't understand the meaning of the word "CRIMINAL". By putting onerous paperwork and fees onto gun ownership they are just punishing the law abiding who aren't the problem and don't need a law to tell them shooting people is unacceptable. Criminals are never going to follow these rules because they are criminals so that leaves one to conclude that Politicians believe that punishing the law-abiding is an acceptable response to crime.
Of Course their Battle Cry is "If It Saves One Life" it's worth it. Horse Puckey. If they really believed that, Alcohol would be banned. Four people a day are killed by drunk drivers alone. Not to mention the costs to society in ruined lives and families destroyed. Of course with alcohol they will proudly state that it's Un-Canadian to punish the vast majority of people who use it responsibly. The fact they rake in Billions in sin tax dollars has nothing to do with it.
Odd the fact that the vast majority of guns are used responsibly doesn't enter the picture. Maybe it's because they get tax money for the gun purchase once and their increasing addiction to OUR money isn't sated by this. Not to mention banning alcohol would cost them votes while banning guns would garner them votes in urban centres.
The non-debate over self-defense and a properably qualified individuals right to carry a firearm really brings up the Hyprocisy of the Anti-Gun's phobia.
When you think about it if it's vital that a police officer carry a handgun in order to protect themselves when confronting evil. It's only logical that we have the right to have one when evil confronts us. Afterall is the Police Officer confronting a rapist,murderer for assaulting a fellow cop or your loved one?
Ask your yourself how many female cops have been raped while in uniform? Is it because the rapist respects the uniform? Or because they know she has a gun? Is she more important then your daughter?
It must be remembered that when the seconds count the police are only minutes away. There are laws that protect them from not showing up on time. This isn't a criticism of Police just a fact.
The Power Seekers In Government need you to be afraid and to have in place laws that make you powerless. They NEED your only course of action to be asking them to do something. Which they gladly do by aquiring more power for themselves and loss of rights for you.
Makes you wonder what they are really doing. Wait we don't have to. Sharon Carstairs told us.
"Gun Control isn't about crime, it's about the pacifying of Canadian men which is vital in the social re-engineering of Canada." MMM
Power Seekers like the term because once again it allows them to have the "Appearance" of doing something to battle crime. Forget the fact that they are simply displaying their ignorance on the topic.
Simply put they tell the masses that they have made this gun or that gun illegal in order to keep everyone safe or that have implemented additional paperwork to discourage Gun ownership.
When you think about it all they are saying is that they don't understand the meaning of the word "CRIMINAL". By putting onerous paperwork and fees onto gun ownership they are just punishing the law abiding who aren't the problem and don't need a law to tell them shooting people is unacceptable. Criminals are never going to follow these rules because they are criminals so that leaves one to conclude that Politicians believe that punishing the law-abiding is an acceptable response to crime.
Of Course their Battle Cry is "If It Saves One Life" it's worth it. Horse Puckey. If they really believed that, Alcohol would be banned. Four people a day are killed by drunk drivers alone. Not to mention the costs to society in ruined lives and families destroyed. Of course with alcohol they will proudly state that it's Un-Canadian to punish the vast majority of people who use it responsibly. The fact they rake in Billions in sin tax dollars has nothing to do with it.
Odd the fact that the vast majority of guns are used responsibly doesn't enter the picture. Maybe it's because they get tax money for the gun purchase once and their increasing addiction to OUR money isn't sated by this. Not to mention banning alcohol would cost them votes while banning guns would garner them votes in urban centres.
The non-debate over self-defense and a properably qualified individuals right to carry a firearm really brings up the Hyprocisy of the Anti-Gun's phobia.
When you think about it if it's vital that a police officer carry a handgun in order to protect themselves when confronting evil. It's only logical that we have the right to have one when evil confronts us. Afterall is the Police Officer confronting a rapist,murderer for assaulting a fellow cop or your loved one?
Ask your yourself how many female cops have been raped while in uniform? Is it because the rapist respects the uniform? Or because they know she has a gun? Is she more important then your daughter?
It must be remembered that when the seconds count the police are only minutes away. There are laws that protect them from not showing up on time. This isn't a criticism of Police just a fact.
The Power Seekers In Government need you to be afraid and to have in place laws that make you powerless. They NEED your only course of action to be asking them to do something. Which they gladly do by aquiring more power for themselves and loss of rights for you.
Makes you wonder what they are really doing. Wait we don't have to. Sharon Carstairs told us.
"Gun Control isn't about crime, it's about the pacifying of Canadian men which is vital in the social re-engineering of Canada." MMM
Thursday, September 10, 2009
Political Correctness Is Intellectual Slavery
In my short fifty years on this planet I've noticed a disturbing trend by the Power Seekers to slowly but surely muzzle any speech that may offend the voters they're trying to attract.
It's not that they really care about these people issues it just adds to their power to control the opposition to their policies. All parties do this so we do have bi-partisan cooperation in the government.
This has resulted in living in a country where for all intents and purposes it's ILLEGAL to tell the truth if it offends anyone the Government of the day is trying to woo.
If you question anything about immigration your a racist. If you question anything about Family Law your a sexist. God forbid you question anything about sexuality or your a raving homophobic.
This condition does nothing but kill open discussion on any topic the Power Seekers wish not to discuss. Finding the truth in any situation can at times offend but that in no ways equates to hate or promoting hatred just because you state what you believe. If it did then the Liberal Party and all their supporters should be charged with hate speech due to their attack and promotion of distrust and loathing of gunowners. In their defense if they didn't do this they would have to admit their "Take A Punk To Lunch" method of crime control doesn't work.
They demonize smokers as if they are the minions of Satan himself but it's legal and they bank billions of sin tax dollars . For the costs to the Health System of course they cry in unison. Of course they just want stop the associated "Life Style" disease by nudging us in the direction they deem right. They do afterall know what's best.
Aside from tainted blood and the poor children born with it AIDS is a life style disease. You'll never hear this of course. Promiscuity and unsafe sex is the cause. But mention this and your homophobic because AIDS is most prolific in that community so we better muzzle that discussion. Is teaching teenagers about safe sex bad? Of course not but if your going to discuss it shouldn't they be given the full picture.
Immigration built this country. They is no question of this. But does that mean that when they come here our tax dollars should be used to help them keep their culture alive? If their community wants to keep their culture alive by teaching their children they can pay for it themselves. As long as they pay for it and understand that Canadian culture (yes we do have one) and traditions trump whatever they believe that's fantastic. I enjoy experiencing the culture of China,Japan,Korea, Russian to name a few. But I certainly don't want to live under their laws and traditions. If I did I would move there. I wonder what the immigration numbers from Canada to China or Russia is?
You will never be able to legislate a person into liking another. It's impossible unless you domesticate and enslave the human spirit. That would reduce us to nothing more than wealth generating units for the State.
Insults and Offence takes two people to be successful. Words cannot hurt you unless you have no self-respect. Despite what the Power Seekers tell us Self-Respect and Self-Esteem have nothing in common.
Self-Respect is attained by accomplishment. Be it small or large. That can never be taken away from you as it comes from within. Self-Esteem on the other hand is something that comes from external sources. Being told your as good as the next person, all evidence to the contrary, is detrimental to individual growth. Not only does it force a child to rely on the opinion of others it retards any chance of growth. Knowing your own weaknesses is your greatest strength as it allows you to work on them. Blaming others is a recipe for a "Persecution Complex" with it's addictive need for the Government to do something which always results in unaccountable power for them and loss of rights for us.
I can't be insulted. How can I possibly say this you may wonder? For example if you were to call me a short,fat,opinionated, racist, and liar. I would simply thank you for sharing your thoughts with me. Not that I agree but because I am short,fat,and opinionated so I can't be insulted by the truth or I have no self-respect.I'm not a racist as I judge people on their character not the colour of their skin,and I'm not a liar so the fact you believe this is of no consequence to me. People that know me know this to be true.But what of the people who don't know me you may ask? Well if they want to believe this about me without verifying it they are mentally lazy so are of no consequence( to me).
Anytime you allow the Power Seekers to not only decide what we can talk about but the definition of the words, you live in a dictatorship. Period.
They love to say it's all to ensure that all people are "Equal and Free" but then again it's their defintion of equal and free. Biologically it's impossible for everyone to be equal so the only way to make it so is to restrict those that were genetically blessed. So in fact Equal and Free are diametrically opposed. So in reality free men aren't equal and equal men aren't free. Power seekers prefer not to recognize this fact as it doesn't fit their agenda.
Liberty Lewis
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what's for supper
Liberty is a well armed sheep contesting the vote.
It's not that they really care about these people issues it just adds to their power to control the opposition to their policies. All parties do this so we do have bi-partisan cooperation in the government.
This has resulted in living in a country where for all intents and purposes it's ILLEGAL to tell the truth if it offends anyone the Government of the day is trying to woo.
If you question anything about immigration your a racist. If you question anything about Family Law your a sexist. God forbid you question anything about sexuality or your a raving homophobic.
This condition does nothing but kill open discussion on any topic the Power Seekers wish not to discuss. Finding the truth in any situation can at times offend but that in no ways equates to hate or promoting hatred just because you state what you believe. If it did then the Liberal Party and all their supporters should be charged with hate speech due to their attack and promotion of distrust and loathing of gunowners. In their defense if they didn't do this they would have to admit their "Take A Punk To Lunch" method of crime control doesn't work.
They demonize smokers as if they are the minions of Satan himself but it's legal and they bank billions of sin tax dollars . For the costs to the Health System of course they cry in unison. Of course they just want stop the associated "Life Style" disease by nudging us in the direction they deem right. They do afterall know what's best.
Aside from tainted blood and the poor children born with it AIDS is a life style disease. You'll never hear this of course. Promiscuity and unsafe sex is the cause. But mention this and your homophobic because AIDS is most prolific in that community so we better muzzle that discussion. Is teaching teenagers about safe sex bad? Of course not but if your going to discuss it shouldn't they be given the full picture.
Immigration built this country. They is no question of this. But does that mean that when they come here our tax dollars should be used to help them keep their culture alive? If their community wants to keep their culture alive by teaching their children they can pay for it themselves. As long as they pay for it and understand that Canadian culture (yes we do have one) and traditions trump whatever they believe that's fantastic. I enjoy experiencing the culture of China,Japan,Korea, Russian to name a few. But I certainly don't want to live under their laws and traditions. If I did I would move there. I wonder what the immigration numbers from Canada to China or Russia is?
You will never be able to legislate a person into liking another. It's impossible unless you domesticate and enslave the human spirit. That would reduce us to nothing more than wealth generating units for the State.
Insults and Offence takes two people to be successful. Words cannot hurt you unless you have no self-respect. Despite what the Power Seekers tell us Self-Respect and Self-Esteem have nothing in common.
Self-Respect is attained by accomplishment. Be it small or large. That can never be taken away from you as it comes from within. Self-Esteem on the other hand is something that comes from external sources. Being told your as good as the next person, all evidence to the contrary, is detrimental to individual growth. Not only does it force a child to rely on the opinion of others it retards any chance of growth. Knowing your own weaknesses is your greatest strength as it allows you to work on them. Blaming others is a recipe for a "Persecution Complex" with it's addictive need for the Government to do something which always results in unaccountable power for them and loss of rights for us.
I can't be insulted. How can I possibly say this you may wonder? For example if you were to call me a short,fat,opinionated, racist, and liar. I would simply thank you for sharing your thoughts with me. Not that I agree but because I am short,fat,and opinionated so I can't be insulted by the truth or I have no self-respect.I'm not a racist as I judge people on their character not the colour of their skin,and I'm not a liar so the fact you believe this is of no consequence to me. People that know me know this to be true.But what of the people who don't know me you may ask? Well if they want to believe this about me without verifying it they are mentally lazy so are of no consequence( to me).
Anytime you allow the Power Seekers to not only decide what we can talk about but the definition of the words, you live in a dictatorship. Period.
They love to say it's all to ensure that all people are "Equal and Free" but then again it's their defintion of equal and free. Biologically it's impossible for everyone to be equal so the only way to make it so is to restrict those that were genetically blessed. So in fact Equal and Free are diametrically opposed. So in reality free men aren't equal and equal men aren't free. Power seekers prefer not to recognize this fact as it doesn't fit their agenda.
Liberty Lewis
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what's for supper
Liberty is a well armed sheep contesting the vote.
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
Why "None Of The Above" Is Vital For Democracy
From speaking to other regular Canadians and then speaking to Politicians I have found a huge difference between what "We The People" think and what the Politicians tell me we think.
When you consider the fact that they constantly lament the lack of voter participation in election you would think they would encourage the option. You would be wrong. I was.
I've been told it's anti-democracy as we have been given the acceptable choices. Are we children? Do we need "Power Seekers" of all Political stripes dictating the choices we have?
They had elections in Communist countries however all the candidates were communist. Is that democracy? I say not even close.
They actually have think tanks trying to figure out the best way to get people engaged in the process. Everything from Citizen Commitees to making a law forcing people to vote!!!
This endless "Pendelum of Stupidity" of voting Liberal and then Conservative is destroying this country. There can be no fundamental change in this country as long as we play by their rules. Politicians LIE they call it "Plausible Deniability" but to you and I it's a lie. They not only want to decide what we talk about, they want to decide the definitions of the words.
If "None Of Above" was on the ballot and published along with all other results it wouldn't change the outcome of an election. It would however show the true will of the Canadian people.
It would be hard for any Political party to wrap themselves in the flag and say they have a mandate from the Canadian people when "None Of The Above " got more votes. Sure they would lose status on the world stage as their policies would be suspect when not even their own citizens trusted them. On the upside dictatorships would love them.
Simply put this country would again reflect what it's citizens want. There would be no need to interpret what Canadians want. It would say clearly that there's room for change. All political parties would REALLY know what the Majority want. NOT THEM and their Policies would start to reflect this. Aren't you tired of Politicians deciding what you want. I Know I am.
In closing I firmly believe that the Power Seekers only want the appearance of Democracy.
Lewis Liberty
When you consider the fact that they constantly lament the lack of voter participation in election you would think they would encourage the option. You would be wrong. I was.
I've been told it's anti-democracy as we have been given the acceptable choices. Are we children? Do we need "Power Seekers" of all Political stripes dictating the choices we have?
They had elections in Communist countries however all the candidates were communist. Is that democracy? I say not even close.
They actually have think tanks trying to figure out the best way to get people engaged in the process. Everything from Citizen Commitees to making a law forcing people to vote!!!
This endless "Pendelum of Stupidity" of voting Liberal and then Conservative is destroying this country. There can be no fundamental change in this country as long as we play by their rules. Politicians LIE they call it "Plausible Deniability" but to you and I it's a lie. They not only want to decide what we talk about, they want to decide the definitions of the words.
If "None Of Above" was on the ballot and published along with all other results it wouldn't change the outcome of an election. It would however show the true will of the Canadian people.
It would be hard for any Political party to wrap themselves in the flag and say they have a mandate from the Canadian people when "None Of The Above " got more votes. Sure they would lose status on the world stage as their policies would be suspect when not even their own citizens trusted them. On the upside dictatorships would love them.
Simply put this country would again reflect what it's citizens want. There would be no need to interpret what Canadians want. It would say clearly that there's room for change. All political parties would REALLY know what the Majority want. NOT THEM and their Policies would start to reflect this. Aren't you tired of Politicians deciding what you want. I Know I am.
In closing I firmly believe that the Power Seekers only want the appearance of Democracy.
Lewis Liberty
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)